|
(4th tetralogy : The
Soul - 2nd dialogue of trilogy) |
|
Plans of the Republic
Note : the numbers in parentheses after the
Stephanus references to the beginning and end of each section
or subsection give the approximate number of Stephanus pages of
that section or subsection.
The "visible" plan of the Republic
Introduction : the five challenges
Prologue : the setting
-- Cephalus : ambiguity, social justice, fear of Hades
-- Polemarchus : uncertainty, give each one his due
-- Thrasymachus : duplicity, law of the stronger, justice for others
-- Glaucon : evading responsibility, justice is a necessary evil, Gyges
-- Adeimantus : make believe, ambiguity of poets, example of the Gods
| 327a-367e (37)
327a-328c ( 1)
328c-331d ( 3)
331d-336a ( 4)
336b-354c (18)
357a-362c ( 5)
362d-367e ( 5)
|
I. The building of the ideal city
-- Genesis of the city
-- Education of the guardians
-- Administrators and laws of the city
| 367e-427c (56)
367e-376c ( 9)
376c-412b (34)
412c-427c (13)
|
II. Justice in city and soul
-- Justice in the city
-- The three parts of the soul
-- Justice in the soul
|
427c-445e (18)
427d-434c ( 7)
434d-441c ( 7)
441c-445e ( 4)
|
A. 1st wave : same education for men and women
(Against Cephalus : "phusis" vs. "ousia")
| 449a-457c ( 8)
|
B. 2nd wave : community of women and children
(Against Polemarchus : "all in common" vs. "each
one his due")
| 457d-471c (14)
|
C. 3rd wave : the philosopher-king
1. The philosopher and the city
(Against Thrasymachus : wisdom vs. strength)
2. The yearning for the good
(Against Glaucon : the cave vs. Gyges)
3. The education of the philosopher-king
(Against Adeimantus : dialectic vs. poetry)
|
471c-543c (63)
471c-502c (26)
502c-521b (17)
521c-543c (20)
|
III. Corruption of city and man
-- From timocracy followed by oligarchy...
-- ...to democracy followed by tyranny
| 543c-580c (35)
|
Conclusion : the five answers
-- To Polemarchus : each part its due
-- To Cephalus : true and false "ousia"
-- To Thrasymachus : tamed strength
-- To Adeimantus : true and false teachers
-- To Glaucon : each one his chosen fate
| 580d-621d (38)
580d-583a ( 3)
583b-588a ( 5)
588b-592b ( 4)
595a-607b (12)
607b-621d (14)
|
|
According to the above plan, the Republic is made up of
three somehow embedded blocks :
- From the most superficial viewpoint, the Republic is
made up of three parts : a main body, the dialogue proper, preceded
by an introduction and followed by a conclusion of almost exactly
the same size. The introduction presents five challenges to Socrates'
notion of justice, each by a different character, the first three
in dialogue form, and the last two mostly in the form of monologues.
The conclusion may be viewed as a set of answers to these five
challenges, based on what has been said in the dialogue proper,
even though they are not directly addressed each to the individual
who presented the answered challenge, and are not given in the
order the challenges were presented, for reasons that are explained
elsewhere.
- The main body of the dialogue may further be split in two, based
on explicit indications given by the author : it begins and ends
with a three part "history" of the genesis and corruption
of the city, viewed as a mirror image "in large letters"
of man's soul, whose justice the discussion is all about. The
first part is totally dedicated to the "rebuilding"
"in speech" of the city, presented as a gathering of
men attempting to live in society, and leads to an organization
in three classes : workers, guardians and rulers. The second part
moves from the justice in the city to that in man's soul, whose
structure is depicted in between, in what may thus be viewed as
the center of this whole "history". And the third part
explains how the city and man together degenerate over time from
the best form of government down to the worst forms of tyranny :
in this later parts, man and city are "woven" together
to show that they interact in such a way as to make it impossible
to say which one explains the troubles in the other.
- But between the second and third part of this "history",
another discussion takes place, which is explicitly depicted by
the author as sort of a foreign body within the surrounding discussion
by the use of the image of three succeeding "waves"
engulfing it. At the beginning and at the end of this "digression",
as well as at each new "wave" that is brought forth,
Socrates wants us to believe that we get once again sidetracked,
or at least that we are tackling a topic that might not be fit
for the "many". Yet again, this discussion in the discussion
is structured in three parts, three "waves", each bigger
that the previous one (in terms of "volume" measured
by the approximate number of pages, the second is about twice
as long as the first, and the third four times as long as the
second). And the third part, the longest, can itself be further
split in three parts in a movement that is the exact opposite
of that of the "history" of the city : whereas the "history"
starts with the "building" of the city, deciphers in
it the structure of man's soul to get to the principles of justice,
and from there falls back towards the corrupted city and man,
the discussion in the third "wave" starts with the corrupt
city which doesn't understand the need for true philosophers,
and the men who only pretend to be philosophers, to move toward
the "forms" which should enlighten men's lives, chief
among them the good beyond being, and build from there the program
of education of the true philosopher-kings, that is, the recipe
for "building" those men who might "rebuild"
the well behaved city.
At all levels of this plan can be found a three-step pattern consonant
with the threefold structure of the soul introduced in the middle
of the middle section of the "middle" discussion : a
desiring, passionate, part (which is actually manifold), the epithumiai,
which is the "reflection" in us of nature, phusis,
matter, biology and the like ; a reasoning part, the logos,
which makes it possible for us to get in touch with the intelligible,
with order, with the "forms" outside time and space,
with the divine ; and in between, an intermediate part, the thumos,
akin to the will, the field of choice, judgment, decision-making
and the like.
- The first three steps of the introduction "stage",
through three succeeding dialogues, the "external" dialogue
of one "soul" with another : the first "soul"
has Socrates as his "logos" (reason), Adeimantus
as his "thumos" (will) and Glaucon as his "epithumiai"
(passions) ; the second one has Cephalus (the "head"
in Greek) as his (empty) "logos", Polemarchus
("principle of fight" in Greek) as his "thumos"
and Thrasymachus ("bold fighter" in Greek) as his "epithumiai".
Forced into the discussion by the "will" of the other
soul (Polemarchus, see the prologue), the first soul lets its "logos"
(Socrates) do the talking while the other soul shortly answers
with its own "logos" (Cephalus) only to let its
will (Polemarchus) take over for a while before being itself silenced
by its unbridled desires (Thrasymachus).
The last two "challenges" depict the result of this
discussion on the lower parts of the soul of which Socrates is
the "logos" : it is the "internal" dialogue
of a soul with itself (hence the monologue form of these last
two parts), the doubts of the desiring part (Glaucon) and the
will (Adeimantus) leading them to ask the reason (Socrates) to
restate its case. And the rest of the discussion is that "dialogue"
of the soul with itself, depicting how reason should behave with
will and passions to bring harmony, that is justice, within oneself
as a condition of its harmony and justice with the outer world,
and primarily with its fellow men.
- The "history" of the genesis and corruption of the
city unfolds in three parts : the genesis (1st part) deals with
the "material" side, the "phusis" (nature)
of the city, its "visible" organization ; the second
part centers on the principles of intelligibility of city and
man, the "form" of justice that is to be achieved in
them ; while the third part shows the various ways of solving the
conflict between the different parts of both man and city, and
the interactions of one with the other, depending on the choices
of the individual and collective "wills".
- In this perspective, the inner section, the "three waves",
is but a long development of the middle part of the "history"
section, the one that explores the principles of intelligibility.
But before explaining that, there remains to show how each one
of the three parts of this "genetic" view of the city,
or at least the first two, is itself structured into three subsections
according to the same principles.
- The first part, the building of the city, moves from a description
of the genesis of the city through its "bodily" needs,
and those of its "building blocks", the citizens, seen
in their worldly "physical" needs, to a lengthy description
of the education of its "guardians", those counterpart
of the will in the soul, and eventually to considerations on the
upper body of government and the laws that give "reason"
to the city.
- Then, the second part, the one that investigates the "forms"
behind the story just told, and transposes them into principles
of understanding of man, starts with the "form" of justice
in the city, that is, justice seen in the many, in the visible,
external, realm of human activity ; to continue with the structure
of the soul, that intermediary between the visible and intelligible
"worlds", between the sphere of becoming and the sphere
of "ideas" outside space and time ; and end with the
definition of justice, the ultimate "form" of man, the
one which reconciles reason, will and desires, brings internal
and external harmony and unity into the man to be.
- Only in the latter part does the threefold scheme give way
to a dualistic structure better fitted to the intermediate level
of conflict, choice and the like : here, the intertwining of the
various degenerative constitutions of city and man is meant to
show that it's no use trying to separate one from the other as
it is no use trying to deny one or another part of man, either
his reason or his material side, his bodily needs.
Yet, one can still find some link with the different levels of
the soul in the different constitutions succeeding one another :
having set aside the reign of "logos", Socrates
moves downward to the reign of a will (in the city, the "analog"
of the intermediate level of the soul is the reign of the few,
intermediate between the one and the many), first looking upward
(timocracy looks for honor, which is a "form"), then
downward (oligarchy seeks material wealth), and ultimately to
the government of the passions, again first looking "upward"
(there is some sort of "reason" in the democracy seeking
the majority rule) then looking "downward" with the
complete irrationality of passions (or tyrant) taking over the
government of man or the city. Two parts of two "beings",
the soul, that is the one private man, (will and desires) and
the city, that is the many political men, (the few or the many,
the tyrant being nothing more than the king of the many), capable
of looking in two directions (upward toward some kinds of "forms",
fainter and fainter as we move downward, or downward toward matter)
lead to two times two times two constitutions of the private or
political man.
Back to the "three waves" : each one must be read
at two levels, at the "political" level (the "obvious"
or "first degree" meaning) and at the "inner"
level of the soul (remember that the city is large letters for
the soul). And if nobody has any problem "reading" the
third wave, the one about the philosopher-king, as meaning that,
at the level of the soul, the logos should be king, very
little time has been spent trying to "decipher" the
first two waves along the same lines. Yet, it can be done and
it sheds new light on Plato's intent. In effect, each section
developing the first two "waves" hold at its center
the "key" for this task, a methodological subsection
which gives the keyword of the whole section. For the first wave,
this keyword is "phusis" (nature, see 453e-454e),
while for the second it is "koinônia" (community,
see 464b) ;
and phusis is what most relates to the lower part of the
soul while koinônia, harmony, getting along, is the
key to the task expected from the middle part in managing the
potential conflict between passions and reason. More precisely :
- What is at stakes in the discussion about the common education
of men and women, read at the "second degree", is the
problem of man's nature : male stands for form and female for matter,
the way it was supposed to be in that time in the generation process.
And what Plato is telling us is that it is no use denying either
the material or the "spiritual" side or our "nature",
to try and limit man, and the whole of being, to more or less
complex bundles of matter, or to attempt to raise him at
the level of some kind of immaterial "form" separate
from matter ; rather, man should first acknowledge his true nature,
accept himself as he is, that is, as both a material and
a spiritual being, both male and female, each side of his
nature put in its proper place, and contributing its share in
the development of his being.
- Then, the discussion on community of women and children,
read at that same "second degree", has to do with activity :
children stand for the "product" of the combined action
of from and matter, that is, acts. And what we are told is that
an individual is in trouble so long as he sees each of his acts
as satisfying one part of his being against another ; rather
he should tend to determine all his acts as coming from the whole
of himself, and act only in so far as each part finds something
acceptable in his behavior (which doesn't mean that each part
will find an equal satisfaction in all acts : eating is more of
a satisfaction for the appetite than for the mind, but it is a
"rational" thing to do so long as you are hungry and
don't fall into gluttony).
- And now, we are ready to better understand the third wave.
The domination of reason is not pure rationalism, technocracy
or the like, but the mere acknowledgment that the upper part of
our soul is the best fit to lead, not to "overcome"
the other two parts, not as a tyrant ignoring them, but as a true
leader, acting for the better of the whole, mind and matter,
body and soul, with the consent of the will.
But then, why is it Plato disguised his thoughts in such a way
as to make even the "first degree" reading almost untenable ?
Why is it that he took the risk of being seen as a kind of Fascist
or totalitarian communist ? We must first recognize that he was
well aware of the risk : the whole business about the three waves,
the remarks of Socrates at each new step, are ample proofs of
it. This being said, the point is that, as always, Plato doesn't
want to give us answers, but to make us think by ourselves, and
find our own answers along the path he is leading us into : he
is only trying to unlock our chains, and to lead us outside the
cave, but we must stand, walk, climb and see by ourselves...
And yet, even the "social" side of his three waves may
be read, not at the grossly exaggerated level he is presenting
them to force us to react and look deeper in the subject matter,
but at a more palatable level which should not surprise us : aren't
we nowadays stressing the fact that, if women are somewhat different
from men, at least in their biological constitution, different
doesn't mean inferior, and should not prevent them from engaging
in most the same activities as men ? And is Plato saying anything
different in the discussion of the first wave ? And haven't we
been brought up with the idea that, even if all men aren't biological
brethren, they should behave as if they were ?...
Having said all this about this plan, we must realize that, though
based on obvious divisions in the subject matter and explicit
indications in the text (hence the title "visible" plan),
it is somewhat "off balance" and "one-sided".
It stresses ruptures rather than continuity, and doesn't respect
the symmetry and proportion of parts (in terms of approximate
number of Stephanus pages) that can so often be found in Plato's
dialogues. And it is all built upon the analogy with the tripartite
structure of the soul, which is only one side of the story.
A closer look at the dialogue reveals another way of arranging the
same "building blocks", which erases the discontinuities
and brings perfect symmetry to the plan, introducing the analogy
of the line, an image of the doubly dual structure of the whole,
as a counterweight to the tripartite structure of the soul. This
other way of looking at the same "matter", with
the eyes of the mind and not only the eyes and ears of the body,
is presented below under the title of "intelligible"
plan of the Republic. By so playing with the "form"
of his dialogue, piling multiple structures on top of one another,
Plato talks to us as much as through words, "staging"
the distinctions he talks about between visible and intelligible
"worlds", and the tripartite structure of the soul,
except that he talks to our mind and requires our active
participation in the deciphering of the dialogue. And it shows us
that there are not two distinct "worlds" but two different
ways of understanding a unique world both visible and intelligible.
There are visible and audible words, and there are "forms"
behind those words, that give logos (meaning) to these
logoi (speeches).
The "intelligible" plan of the Republic
Introduction : the five challenges
Prologue : the setting
-- Cephalus : ambiguity, social justice, fear of Hades
-- Polemarchus : uncertainty, give each one his due
-- Thrasymachus : duplicity, law of the stronger, justice for others
-- Glaucon : evading responsibility, justice is a necessary evil, Gyges
-- Adeimantus : make believe, ambiguity of poets, example of the Gods
| 327a-367e (37)
327a-328c ( 1)
328c-331d ( 3)
331d-336a ( 4)
336b-354c (18)
357a-362c ( 5)
362d-367e ( 5)
|
I. The building of the ideal city
-- Genesis of the city
-- Education of the guardians
-- Administrators and laws of the city
| 367e-427c (56)
367e-376c ( 9)
376c-412b (34)
412c-427c (13)
|
II. Justice in city and soul
-- Justice in the city
-- The three parts of the soul
-- Justice in the soul
| 427c-445e (18)
427d-434c ( 7)
434d-441c ( 7)
441c-445e ( 4)
|
The conditions of feasibility
" People won't deem what I say feasible"
(450c)
| 449a-502c (49)
|
1. " Phusis" : same education for men and women
2. "Koinônia" : community of women and children
| 449a-457c ( 8)
457d-471c (14)
|
The paradigm : the philosopher-king
" Won't by nature action have a lesser
share with truth than speech ? "
(473a)
| 471c-474c ( 3)
|
3. " Dunamis" : knowledge vs. opinion, philosopher vs. friends of opinion
4. "Theou moira" : the philosopher and the crowd
" Our model of legislation, if feasible, is the best one,
and, though hard to implement, yet is not impossible"
(502c)
| 474d-480a ( 6)
484a-502c (18)
|
III. The yearning for the good
-- The image of the good
-- The analogy of the line : visible and intelligible worlds
-- The cave : the paradigm of education
| 502c-521b (17)
502c-509b ( 7)
509c-511e ( 2)
514a-521b (7)
|
IV. The becoming of city and man
-- Education of the philosopher-king (monarchy)
-- From timocracy and oligarchy...
-- ...to democracy and tyranny
| 521c-580c (55)
521c-543c (20)
543c-555a (12)
555b-580c (23)
|
Conclusion : the five answers
-- To Polemarchus : each part its due
-- To Cephalus : true and false "ousia"
-- To Thrasymachus : tamed strength
-- To Adeimantus : true and false teachers
-- To Glaucon : each one his chosen fate
| 580d-621d (38)
580d-583a ( 3)
583b-588a ( 5)
588b-592b ( 4)
595a-607b (12)
607b-621d (14)
|
|
This plan is no longer built solely on the odd number three (the
number of the soul), but also on the even numbers two and four
(the numbers of the line). It doesn't change the view on the "outer
core" (introduction and conclusion), but rather rearranges
the two blocs that make up the dialogue proper without getting "derailed"
by the wave business that was used as a guide in the first plan.
It unfolds in a perfect symmetry on either sides of the "material"
center of the dialogue, where can be found the central message of
the dialogue, which is also the central message of the whole set
of the dialogues (the Republic is the central dialogue of the
central trilogy, that is, the logical center of the whole
work) : "unless either philosophers become kings in the
cities, or those who are now called kings and rulers sincerely
and adequately get to philosophize, and there can be found in
the same person both political power and philosophy, the crowd
of those who are nowadays driven by their nature toward either
one exclusive of the other having been forcibly set aside, there
can be no end, dear Glaucon, to the evils in cities, nor, methinks,
to those of humankind." (473c-d)
Most of the reordering results from a closer analysis of the lengthy
section on the philosopher-king, the "third wave", which
is only befitting, as this section is supposed, by our earlier
analyses, which are no more rendered obsolete by the second plan
than the visible world is denied by the intelligible one, to provide
the logos of the logos of the discussion : the three
wave section as a whole, far from being a foreign body, stands
to the rest of the dialogue as the logos to the rest of the
soul, and, within this section, the third wave deals with the
logos and its role in soul and society. We have already
seen in the previous analyses that the discussion making up the
third wave could be split in three parts. There remains to be
seen how the first part relates to what comes before, and the
third to what follows, to reach the new ordering of the topics.
- The first subsection, the one called "the philosopher
and the city" in the first plan, can be further split into
two parts that somehow "answer" the sections constituting
the first two waves, only in reverse order. In fact, it is the
whole second half of the dialogue which "answers" the
first half in reverse order : the first half of the dialogue is a
slow ascent from the genetic analysis of the city of men toward
the guiding principle that should lead men and cities alike ; while
the second half takes us back from the principle down to its consequences
in our world, and those of not following it. The sections we are
now considering are the beginning of that trip back. And, as was
the case with the last two steps of the climb, each one of these
first two steps down holds in its center the buzz word that explains
its purpose.
- For the first one, dealing with the difference between knowledge
and opinion, between the true philosopher, friend of truth, and
the mere philodoxer, that is, the friend of opinion, the
buzz word is dunamis, that is power, driving force, ability,
of which a definition is given by Socrates at 477d
(the exact middle of the subsection), when he states that a dunamis
is defined solely by what it drives at. While the first part of
the dialogue got started by looking at the explanatory power of
phusis, the origin, to understand the city, and, through
it, man whose work it is, the second part starts by investigating
the explanatory power of the end, of the "form", looking
for the dunamis within man that will bring koinônia,
that harmony in his social life as a consequence of harmony within,
which was sought in the last step of the ascent.
- For the second step, dealing with the relationship between
the philosopher (true and false) and the crowd, the buzz word,
once again found at the exact middle of the section, is theou
moira, divine share : in the midst of a discussion where Socrates
explains how the best natures get corrupted by the surrounding
crowd to become the worst when applying their gifts to wrong ends
(and it is impossible to read these lines without thinking of
Alcibiades with whom we started the whole journey through the
dialogues, especially at 494c),
or else end up in courts thanks to the sophists, where they risk
to be put to death, like Socrates himself (492d),
he states at the turn of a phrase that "whoever happens
to be saved and becomes what he should be in such a political
context, you will say nothing wrong in declaring that a divine
share saves him" (492e-493a).
That divine share is the god-given logos in us, which enables
us to reach out toward the eternal "forms", toward that
ideal outside us which alone can get us moving so as to become
what we are meant to be.
Thus, the inner section of the second plan taken as a whole, whose
purpose is to investigate the conditions of feasibility of justice
in us and in the city, starts by telling us that we should accept
the whole of our nature (phusis), both individual and social,
and bring harmony (koinônia) within and without,
not by waiting for some kind of self-developing "germ"
to do the job, but by turning all our faculties (dunamis),
under the leadership of the god-given logos (theou moira),
toward the godly ideal of true justice, which alone will make
us men.
- At the other end of the philosopher-king section, the subsection
on the education of the philosopher-king can be viewed as the
first part of a section that describes all the possible
constitution for man and city, this one being the "monarchical",
that is, the ideal one. Here again, this section is symmetrical
of the first section on the building of the ideal city : This first
part on the education of the philosopher-king echoes the last
part of the first section on the rulers and laws of the city,
while the middle part on timocracy and oligarchy shows what happens
when the "guardians" overstep their rights and the last
part on democracy and tyranny describes the city where everybody
wants to have a share in everything rather than minding his own
business, or chooses as a "king" some unfit person,
which is the exact opposite of what made the city possible in
the first place.
- We are thus left with the middle section, including the comparison
between the sun and the good, the image of the line and the allegory
of the cave, and we can see that it is the exact symmetric of
the section describing the justice in city and man and the structure
of the soul in between, both "physically" (size and
distance from the center of the dialogue) and logically. And whereas
the section in the first part of the dialogue was moving from the
principles behind the building process of the "external"
city to the inner justice in man through the description of its
inner structure, the corresponding section in the second part
of the dialogue moves from an image of the light behind the justice
to be built to the principles of the building process within man,
education, through a description of the whole of being. And, as
has already been said, the central section of each of these two
symmetric parts provides the two structuring principles of the
dialogues : the internal tripartite structure of man and the external
quadripartite structure of the whole.
We may now see how these two principles combine in this plan of
the Republic. Each half of the dialogue proceeds in three
"waves" in opposite directions, but not the "waves"
Socrates points at :
- In the first half we start with facts in the introduction :
the various ways most people understand justice. Then we climb
one stair toward intelligibility to reach some understanding of
what justice is, both in the city and in man, using the image
of the city, the big letters, to read the finer print of justice
in us. This phase of the discussion proceeds in two parts, the
first one, the building of the ideal city, in the realm of the
visible world, the second one, justice in city and soul, in the
sphere of forms. But each one of these two parts is itself structured
in three subsections according to the structure of the soul, as
was shown earlier. Eventually, we must climb one more stair toward
a deeper intelligence of the principles behind the newly found
justice. And here again, we proceed in two parts, one in the realm
of "nature", the other at the level of forms ("koinônia").
A closer analysis of these two subsections would show that they
too are further subdivided in three, along the same lines as the
previous ones.
- Once the ultimate principle of justice, the leadership of
logos, has been stated, the second half of the dialogue takes
us back to ground floor through similar steps. The first half
of the dialogue got us to "static" principles : what are
the parts of the soul, what is justice within such a structure.
The second half of the dialogue brings movement, dynamics, in the
picture : how to get there, what is there outside
of us that we should strive at to reach this justice that we depicted
earlier. Thus we start with the principles of dynamics, again
in two parts : in the realm of forms, truth and opinion as possible
objects of philia ; then in the sphere of the visible world,
when we are shown the relationship between the philosopher and
the crowd (and here again, each subsection could be shown to further
split in three parts). One floor down, we find the description
of the various paths man and city can follow either toward or
away from the principle of justice : first in the sphere of the
intelligible, with the allegory of the cave as a paradigm of education ;
then in the visible world with the description of the educational
program of the rulers and of the various deviations not following
it leads to (and here again, each of these two parts follows a
three steps progression). Eventually, the conclusion corrects
the false views expounded in the introduction in the light of
the uncovered principles.
(Another version of these plans is available, showing
the distribution of roles between Adeimantus, Glaucon and the other speakers)
Plato and his dialogues : Home
- Biography - Works
and links to them - History
of interpretation - New hypotheses -
Map of dialogues : table version
or non tabular version. Tools :
Index of persons and locations - Detailed
and synoptic chronologies - Maps
of Ancient Greek World. Site information : About
the author.
Tetralogies : Republic's home page - 4th
Tetralogy's home page - Text of dialogue in Greek
or English
at Perseus
First published August 14, 1996 - Last updated January 1st, 2006
© 1996
Bernard SUZANNE
(click on name to send your comments via e-mail)
Quotations from theses pages are authorized provided they
mention the author's name and source of quotation (including date of
last update). Copies of these pages must not alter the text and leave
this copyright mention visible in full.